It is not only AmoLatina, but every DATING SITE is designed to cheat men out of their money. I worked as a translator at one of these sites. And I CAN TELL you it is a fraud. Hundreds of men of United States of America, Canada, and Europe are being fooled by hundreds of girls of Russia, Ukraine, and Latin America. Through the “DATING SITES” (AGENCIAS DE MATRIMONIO, in Spanish).

Day after day, the number of tricked men increases, notwithstanding the warning of other men. Who knows what is really happening in these sites. This denounces I am constructing is meant to be a warning against such a trick. Read it carefully and collaborate with me in this denounce. The more persons you warn against that trick, the better. I want this warning to snowball so much as to frustrate it.

Are you a fool? Why do you pay for a service which is nothing but a FRAUD? They offer the “opportunity to know beautiful girls through ONLINE MEETING”. But what do you get for your money? You think that you are chatting with a girl, where the one who is typing is a man or an old woman (named translator). This “translator” has been trained to fool you, that you spend your money on chatting, that you spend your money on “GIFTS”. The “DATING SITE” swears to be “ANTIFRAUD PROOF”. But they are constraining their girls to sign and video a written declaration that they get no pay for their photos being cataloged or their images. Being used in WEBCAM, which declaration is delusive.

AmoLatina Scammer Site – Beware of Online Dating

The more men the “translator” wiles concurrently, the better. Both woman and translator get a vague commission for it. The amount of this commission is unknown, but, for sure, risible, and this is maybe the worst. I worked in one of these agencies (in Medellin, Colombia), for almost one year (August-June, 2008-2009). And I know certainly that here girls worked without a covenant with their “managers” about this commission. They simply get one pay every 15 days for a chat. Which is rather capricious or arbitrary, and one commission for gifts.

I will mention, as an example, the Sangoma’s case, the woman I teamed with for six months (from January to June of 2009). Her nickname was Sandgom. The Sangoma’s average was about 10 men daily. Every message in chat costs less than one dollar. The average of messages every man transmitted was about 100 in our 8 hours shift, which may amount to about $ 80. So, ten men chatting with us might have become an 800 dollars gain for the owner (or owners) of the “Dating Site” every day. How much of this gain was given to Sandbox? 15 dollars only, as an average. Notwithstanding, there were days in which she was told she had made nothing but 3 dollars in her 8 hours shift.

AmoLatina Fake Site

As for the gifts, when one man orders flowers (or other false “gifts”, as candies, English lessons, and jewelry) for one woman, this one does not get the flowers but one little commission for them (about 10%).

Of course, there are many lawsuits against the “Dating Sites”. How are they presenting themselves to be convicted? They force their ladies to sign and video a written declaration that they are in their respective agencies, neither for money nor for gifts, but for their wanting one husband, which declaration is completely false, except for a few women. Women relucting to sign such declaration are threatened to be unpaid for their chats.
Dating chats are as lucrative as sex chats are. The difference is, besides the unreality of women being nakedly exhibited, that men in sex chats know it is a mere erotic play, whereas men in dating sites do not know that most of the women are dissembling with them.

RELATED ARTICLE: AmoLatina.com site is a scam aimed at fleecing you of your money

“Translators” personate their teamers mainly when a camera is off. When one woman is not able to come to “office”, the translator makes men believe that they are chatting with her. There are cases, even, in which translators personate women who are not “working” for their agencies, women who, for whatever reason, have consented to the institution of their “profiles” Beware of Online Dating and neglected to demand the removal of these ones. In December of 2008, I was told by the owner of the agency to log in to chat under the nicknames of some of these women. They did not know that we were personating them.